10 Best Light Weight Hiking Shoes

Published on: May 3, 2019 author: admin

The momentum in hiking footwear is moving removed from large boots toward light-weight shoes and even path runners that square measure quicker and better-off. you are doing lose some mortise joint support once carrying a significant pack or traversing rocky trails, however the load savings and feathery feel square measure worthwhile for several


Below square measure our favorite hiking shoes of 2019, from ultralight choices for quick and lightweight visits to a lot of substantiative models for carrying a full pack. For a lot of background info, see our comparison table and shopping for recommendation below the picks. If you favor Associate in Nursing over-the-ankle vogue, cross-check our article on the most effective hiking boots.


American Revolutionary leader X radical three GTX ($150)

Type: Hiking shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 10.8 oz.

Waterproof: affirmative (non-GTX available)

What we have a tendency to like: a nice mixture of lightness, durability, and on-trail performance.

What we have a tendency to don’t: match runs a touch slim. The American Revolutionary leader X radical three is our high light-weight hiking shoe for 2019, combining a feathery feel with spectacular on-trail performance. like the previous model, the third edition puts it all together:

The shoe is competitively light-weight at one pound ten ounces (for a men’s size 9), the tread style offers spectacular grip in barely concerning all conditions, and therefore the stable chassis and soft interior square measure nice for long path days. All told, we have a tendency to extremely suggest the X radical for day hikes, fast summits, and even light-weight packing.

Salomon Drew heavily from their path running experience with the X radical 3’s style. The single-pull laces square measure quick to use and supply a secure match, and therefore the shoe is much a lot of nimble than ancient hikers just like the Merrell Moab a pair of or Keen Targhee III below. however, you don’t sacrifice protection like with a path runner—Salomon includes a considerable toe cap and enough artifact underfoot for trucking a pack. the sole challenge could also be fit—we’ve found the X radical three will run a touch slim overall—but otherwise, we predict it’s the most effective comprehensive hiking shoe on the market

Merrell Moab a pair of Vent ($100)

Type: Hiking shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 15 oz.

Waterproof: No (waterproof available)

What we have a tendency to like: terribly snug and a good worth.

What we have a tendency to don’t: Not a shoe for the technical parcel.

These might not be your long distance or ultra-rugged hiking shoes, however, there's a great deal to love concerning Merrell’s flagship Moab a pair of. What has created this shoe thus in style over the years? a light-weight however planted feel, a cushty match, and a sexy worth purpose.

Merrell updated the Moab one or two of years past as well as a lot of sturdy higher and bigger artifact within the heel of the footbed, however, the formula, for the most part, remains an equivalent. For day hikers jutting to established trails, the Moab a pair of may be a nice worth.

In terms of downsides, on rocky and muddy trails we have a tendency to found that traction and stability come short of a performance shoe just like the American Revolutionary leader X radical on top of. And despite a competitive 1-pound 15-ounce weight for a combine, the shoe feels a touch slow and cumbersome compared with some lighter models. however these square measure little complaints concerning Associate in a Nursing otherwise fantastic shoe, and that we extremely suggest the Moab a pair of for day hikes and light-weight packing. detain mind that we have a tendency to enclosed the non-waterproof “Vent” here, however, Merrell additionally makes a water-resistant version that prices $120 and weighs slightly a lot of at {2|two|a combine of} pounds one ounce per pair.

Altra Lone Peak four.0 ($120)

Type: Trail-running shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 4.4 oz.

Waterproof: No (water resistant available)

What we have a tendency to like: flare with a plush artifact.

What we have a tendency to don’t: Wide match isn’t nice for a troublesome parcel.

Running-centric whole Altra has become a go-to choice for minimalist hikers, with a robust line-up of heavily soft nevertheless light-weight zero-drop shoes. Their flagship path runner is that the Lone Peak, that additionally has several loyalists within the thru-hiking community for its combination of weight and luxury. Last summer Altra discharged the “4,” and therefore the main changes embrace a longer-lasting sole, a lot of sturdy mesh higher material, and upgraded evacuation ports around the toes for creek crossings. We’ve found that the Lone Peak is in good order powerful, provides solid traction, and therefore the thick artifact isolates you from harsh impacts underfoot.

There square measure a number of vital things to stay in mind once selecting a trail-running shoe just like the Altra Lone Peak for hiking. First, you get less protection at the toe and on the edges of the foot than the shoes on top of. Second, the shoe flexes quite a conventional tramper and won’t be as snug on steep climbs and over the rocky parcel. Third, this shoe encompasses a wide match, and notably within the toe box. If you've got slim feet, we have a tendency to suggest wanting elsewhere on this list, as well as Saucony’s Peregrine eight below.

The North Face radical a hundred and ten GTX ($120)

Type: Hiking/trail-running shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 15 oz.

Waterproof: affirmative

What we have a tendency to like: nice stability and traction for rough trails.

What we have a tendency to don’t: a touch serious for a performance model.

The North Face might list the radical a hundred and ten GTX as a trail-running shoe, however, we predict it checks all the boxes for a high-quality light-weight hiker: it's a stable platform, sensible foot protection, and sturdy construction. we have a tendency to were huge fans of the previous radical 109 GTX, and therefore a hundred and ten addresses our primary complaint: tread life. Whereas the 109 wore down in but one season of use, the updated rubber is far a lot of aggressive and is holding up much better on the rocky and rough trails of the Cascade Range.

One of the radical 110’s nearest competitors is that the American Revolutionary leader X radical three on top of. The North Face shoe may be a very little stiffer and a lot of stability in a technical parcel, grips even as well because of the American Revolutionary leader, and undercuts it in worth by $30. On the opposite hand, the radical a hundred and ten weighs a pair of ounces a lot of per shoe and feels a touch gawky by comparison. In the end, we have a tendency to offer the slight edge to the nimbler X radical three, however, The North Face encompasses a real winner within the radical a hundred and ten GTX.

Adidas outside Terrex Swift R2 GTX ($135)

Type: Hiking shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 8.6 oz.

Waterproof: affirmative (non-GTX available)

What we have a tendency to like: light-weight and difficult.

What we have a tendency to don’t: a touch stiff.

Adidas has swollen its hiking footwear line considerably in recent years, and therefore the updated Terrex Swift R2 GTX is incredibly capable on the path. The sleek style and single-pull lacing system square measure such as an American Revolutionary leader shoe, however at one pound eight.6 ounces, the R2 is even lighter and more durable than the X radical three GTX on top of. the only really looks like a hiking boot, toe and protection around the facet of the foot square measure spectacular, and therefore the Gore-Tex lining provides waterproofing while not feeling sloughy. That’s a winning formula for Adidas and has created the Terrex line quite in style.

Why is that the Adidas Terrex Swift R2 stratified here? we have a tendency to found the shoe to air the stiff side—it unsnarled up a touch once one or two of days of packing within the Mormon State canon Country, however, remains noticeable. additionally, though the Lace bungee cord system is purposeful and that we haven’t had any problems with it, it’s undoubtedly not as sleek or easy-to-use as Salomon’s tried-and-true Quicklace. In terms of support and stability, the R2 is cut fairly low, however, Adidas will build the shoe in a very middle GTX version (1 pound thirteen.2 ounces for the combine.

La Sportiva TX3 ($135)

Type: Approach Shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 9 oz.

Waterproof: No

What we have a tendency to like: Approach shoe grip with hiking shoe comfort and weight.

What we have a tendency to don’t: Mesh higher isn’t super sturdy within the future.

The La Sportiva American state three definitely isn’t a conventional decide, however, a boy will we love this shoe. It’s engineered as Associate in Nursing approach shoe, which implies that it’s grippy and difficult for long hikes to rise objectives or traveling over the steep, rocky parcel. The Vibram sole, full rubber rand, and sleek space of sticky rubber underneath the toe build it a good choice for scrambling, smearing, and border on the rock. however what we've got been affected with most is its versatility: the TX3 will equally well moving quickly on the path with its light-weight, breathable, and moderately versatile construction. we have a tendency to even adore it for everyday use because of the high levels of comfort and engaging style.

As with most approach shoes, the La Sportiva TX3 will have limitations. The dotty tread grips exceptionally well on wet and dry rock and even affected the U.S.A. with traction on snow, however, it'll come short of a real hiking shoe in dirt and dirt. More, the mesh higher of our shoe has begun to wear in a very few areas quicker than we’d like. La Sportiva will build this shoe in a very range of versions, as well as an animal skin TX2 (extra durability) up to the robust TX5 (a full-on hiking boot.

Keen Targhee III WP ($135)

Type: Hiking shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 14.8 oz.

Waterproof: affirmative (non-WP available)

What we have a tendency to like: a pleasant update that modernizes the classic Targhee style.

What we have a tendency to don’t: Pricier than the Merrell Moab a pair of while not enough to indicate for it.

Not to be outdone by Merrell’s update to their signature Moab shoes, Keen discharged a replacement Targhee late last year. The changes weren't groundbreaking however do a pleasant job at modernizing the classic style. most significantly, the super wide footbed of the previous model has been cut down slightly to offer the shoe a rather less sloppy feel over the rocky parcel. The Targhee III still won’t be confused with Associate in the Nursing aggressive model just like the American Revolutionary leader X radical three on top of, however, its powerful animal skin construction, affordable weight, and well-cushioned interior build it a good casual tramper.

Among day hiking choices, the Keen Targhee III and Merrell Moab a pair of on top of square measure 2 of the foremost in style on the market. each square measure terribly snugs right out of the box and supply lots of support and traction for non-technical trails and may even do the trick on shorter packing visits. The Targhee’s Nubuck animal skin higher may be a very little a lot of sturdy than the mesh used on the Moab, however, the Keen isn’t pretty much as good of worth at $135. That worth distinction and wide match square measure what push it slightly down our list, however you actually can’t fail with either model.

Saucony Peregrine eight ($120)

Type: Trail-running shoe

Weight: one avoirdupois unit. 4 oz.

Waterproof: No

What we have a tendency to like: light-weight with fantastic traction.

What we have a tendency to don’t: Flexy and not terribly sturdy.

Saucony’s Peregrine has stood atop our trail-running shoe round-up for the variety of years, however, it’s additionally well-tried to be an awfully capable tramper. Arguably the Peregrine’s best feature is its aggressive tread style. The substantial 6mm lugs have the fantastic bite and combined with a nice soft midsole, give lots of shock absorption for high-mileage days. like most trail-running shoes, it’s a lot of versatile than a real hiking model and isn’t as snug or stable once carrying a significant load. however if you don’t would like a lot of within the method of mortise joint support, the Peregrine is like minded for day hikes and quick and lightweight packing.

For running, we have a tendency to like the Peregrine eight over the Lone Peak four.0 above. however the Altra’s slew of hiking-friendly features—including a gaiter attachment, rock plate, and drain ports—make it the superior comprehensive tramper. Further, the Lone Peak four.0’s new mesh higher is a lot of sturdy for extended path use. That being aforementioned, the Peregrine gets the sting in traction, and its tighter slot in the toe box makes it the higher alternative for those with slim feet.

Vasque Breeze three.0 Low GTX ($150)

Type: Hiking shoe

Weight: a pair of avoirdupois unit. 3 oz.

Waterproof: affirmative (non-GTX available)

What we have a tendency to like: powerful build, snug underfoot.

What we have a tendency to don’t: Lacing system may use Associate in a Nursing upgrade.

With a stable platform and light-weight higher, the Vasque Breeze three.0 may be a completely fashionable hiking shoe. The substantial Vibram rubber and wide base may be a huge contributor, providing reliable traction and lots of support for carrying a loaded down pack. And as we've come back to expect from Vasque, the Breeze's construction, fit, and luxury square measure all wonderful.

Mesh panels are creatively distributed throughout the Breeze three.0's higher for moderate breathability, despite the Gore-Tex construction. It's still not cool within the summer, however, they've clearly created an attempt for it to be tolerable. Vasque additionally manages to retain a great deal of protection for the toes and heel—plenty adequate for established trails and even delicate off-trail use. Our biggest criticism is that the lacing system isn’t up to an equivalent caliber because the remainder of the shoe and does not secure fine over the highest of the foot, nor square measure the eyelets as sturdy as several of its competitors.

Fix that, and this otherwise solid shoe can move up the list.

Oboz serration II Low BDry ($140)

Type: Hiking shoe

Weight: a pair of avoirdupois unit. 2.8 oz.

Waterproof: affirmative (non-WP available)

What we have a tendency to like: durable, grippy, and quite snug.

What we have a tendency to don’t: a touch slow and ungainly during this crowd.

Based in Bozeman, Montana, it shouldn’t come back as a surprise that Oboz footwear is noted for its stability and traction. Their serration II Low—updated for 2019 and additionally offered in a very mid-height boot—clearly is constructed for the rough trails you’ll notice within the chain of mountains. It’s not the lightest shoe around and isn’t suggested for the quick hiking crowd, however, we’ve found it to be a pleasant answer for folk wanting to upgrade in stiffness and support from their Merrell Moabs.

Part of this strength is attributed to their proprietary heel counter, that holds its form well and keeps you steady even over off-camber and rough parcel.

offered in either the waterproof BDry model or a non-waterproof version for $30 less, breathability is tight as long because the temperatures don’t get too hot, because of counteractive panels of mesh and animal skin. Overall, the serration might not be spirited, however, it’s well-built, encompasses a solid base, and feels secure on your feet.


I am a passionate blogger who loves to write things on travel.